A Review of Howard Ball's At Liberty to Die: The Battle for Death With
Dignity in America.
Published
by New York University Press (2012)
Price:
$24.20 (Paper)
On
February 6th of this year (2015) the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that
competent adults living with a terminal disease can ask a physician to help
them die. This decision has triggered an
extremely intense conversation about end of life issues here in Canada. There's nothing wrong with a conversation
like this but those of us who participate need to be informed as we "dive
in" with our own thoughts and beliefs.
It cannot be repeated often enough that informed decision making is how
democracy works best.
As
I was preparing for an internet conversation on the subject of Physician Assisted
Suicide I ran across Howard Ball's book on the subject. Entitled At
Liberty to Die: The Battle for Death with Dignity in America Ball's book surveys
the legal decision making that addresses the subject of Physician Assisted
Suicide and euthanasia. He explains many
of the constitutional issues and how different key sections and amendments of
the American constitution have been used and interpreted. Ball raises several important questions, and
issues, about how we die. He also asks us to consider under which circumstances
we end our lives.
In
At Liberty to Die Ball introduces us
to the different courts that have heard and rendered decisions on a variety of
cases and appeals. We read how
politicians and religious leaders have contributed to the debate. It is both interesting and troubling to read
how the different ideologies clash without regard for the lives of the people
directly affected by their terminal condition. Ball navigates this conflict in
a clear, accessible and informative way.
He defines key terms and explorers what it means to be a competent adult
and a physician committing to "doing no harm". He informs the reader about how competent
adults would be screened as they proceed along the way to their respects
ends.
Many
lawmakers and lobbyists are correct in suggesting that this process is open to
abuse on a variety of fronts and Ball offers suggestions on how this risk of
abuse can be reduced. Many of the court
decisions mentioned in At Liberty to Die address
the series of events that would be necessary for a patient to have their
requests granted. Courts often base
these decisions on such concepts as the patient's right to privacy and freedom
over their body. They confront demands
that we uphold the notion of the sanctity of life.
Regardless
of our religious, political or philosophical leanings Ball gives us some sense
of the complexity faced by leaders and decision makers. This, alone, should serve us on our
collective journey towards some sort of resolution and legal work that helps
competent patients address their future.
This
is a debate and conversation that has it all.
There is something for the philosopher, politician, lawyer, theologian,
physician, families, patients and many others.
In At Liberty to Die Ball
offers a resource that can help us understand the issues and figure out what
the content of this conversation means for each and every situation.
With
this in mind I would commend At Liberty
to Die to readers participating in the ongoing discussion on Doctor
Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia. This
would include church leaders and lay people.
I would also include civic leaders in this group as well. Even though the content of At Liberty to Die is drawn from the
American context it can still be a helpful resource for those of us struggling
with the issue here in Canada. Once
again, democratic decisions need to be informed and this is especially true of
how we end our days when living with a terminal illness.
No comments:
Post a Comment